Keystone XL Pipeline: A Risky Opportunity
Introduction to Transport Management, TLMT 311
Stand of Contents
Introduction three or more
Overview of Concern 3-6
Followers of Keystone XL Pipe 6-7
Exploration of Opposition to Keystone XL Pipeline 7-8
Conclusion on the lookout for
Throughout history, The United States continues to be much reliant upon essential oil rich countries for water fuel necessities. Current economic conditions cause a household alternative, seeing that oil happens to be referred to as ‘black gold'. In recent years, pipelines have become a substantial travel factor pertaining to liquid powers throughout Ak and the reduced 48 continental states. Promises by Director Barack Obama have offered Americans the hope the particular one day the usa can be strength independent. Presently this is not plausible, but many believe that the Keystone XL pipe could decrease the habbit of overseas oil and produce various needed careers within the United States. Controversial concerns have led a Usa president Permit to get the project to be decreased due to the project currently not being in the country's best interest. Various debates took place over this decision and governmental policies have become a key focal point. Several claim it truly is due to particular interest organizations, others declare it's as a result of environmental things. Regardless of the politics involved, the development of the Keystone XL Canal would be as well environmentally detrimental and expensive to pursue.
In 2005, the Keystone Pipeline Program, labeled ‘Keystone XL', was introduced by TransCanada subsequent an expected production boost of crude oil from the Oil Sands location of Alberta, Canada (Parfomak, Pirog & Luther, 2013, p. 3). The expected cost of the Keystone XL pipeline will be set in seven billion dollars, with total range of subterranean piping in 1, 702 miles (Casey-Lefkowitz & Shope, 2011, p. 2). The pipeline could connect Alberta, Canada to advanced refineries in the Gulf of mexico Coast of the United States (Parfomak et al. 2013, p. 1). Since the suggested pipeline system would connect the United States with a foreign region, a Presidential Permit will be required to determine whether the pipe was in the country's best interest (Montopoli, 2012). In 2008, TransCanada applied for a permit to cross the international boundary with the recommended pipeline system and was subsequently denied due to the Condition Departments too little time for assessment and environmental issues with the proposal (2012). In 2012, TransCanada submitted a reconfigured pitch that would hook up the pipe from Alberta, Canada to an existing canal in Metal City, Nebraska. Again, this kind of proposal was denied by President with a response in the State Division that the canal was currently not in the nation's welfare (Parfomak ain al. 2013, p. 2). Many legislative methods to support the pipeline were tackled by Congress that subsequently would copy approval power, although non-e thus far have been completely successful (2013, p. 3).
President Barack Obama has been under general public scrutiny pertaining to his decision in question the allow by many respectable members of government in favor of the pipeline. Based on the Washington Post, Obama subscriber and billionaire Tom Snyder wrote a letter proclaiming that " Obama to reject canal or face backlash” (Bradley, 2013). Snyder, a self-proclaimed environmentalist continues to be linked to big oil simply by amassing a big portion of his fortune through investments in TransCanada's competitor, Gentler Morgan (2013). Republicans, such as frontrunner Romney, went on record by stating " that shows a President who also once again provides put national politics ahead of sound policy”, and " if perhaps Americans wish to understand how come unemployment in the us has been trapped above almost eight percent intended for the greatest stretch since the Great Depression, decisions like this one are definitely the place to begin”...
References: Bradley, Jr., Robert. (2013). Keystone xl quantities to america 's pipe vs . leader obama 's cronies. Forbes Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertbradley/2013/08/20/keystone-xl-amounts-to-americas-pipeline-vs-president-obamas-cronies/
Casey-Lefkowitz, S i9000., Shope, Electronic. (2011). Decline tar sands pipeline: Proposed keystone xl project will deliver soiled fuel for a high cost. Natural Assets Defense Council. Retrieved coming from http://www.nrdc.org/land/files/TarSandsPipeline4pgr.pdf
Coyle, J. M., Novack, L. A., Gibson, B. M., & Bardi, E. J. (2011). Transportation: A Source Chain Perspective. 7th release. South Traditional western College Posting.
Montopoli, Brian. (2012). Obama denies keystone xl canal permit. CBSNews. Retrieved via http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57361324-503544/obama-denies-keystone-xl-pipeline-permit/
Parfomak, P. T., Pirog, R., Luther, D., Vann, A. (2013). Keystone XL pipeline project: Crucial Issues. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Services. Retrieved from http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41668.pdf
Fast, A., Casey-Lefkowitz, S., Shope, E. (2011). Tar sands pipeline security risk. Nationwide Resources Protection Council. Gathered from http://www.dirtyoilsands.org/files/tarsandssafetyrisks.pdf