The Question of Female Citizenship Catherine Tupper
In the early 1800's a young gentleman by the name of Wayne Martin was denied by the lower court when he stated that his deceased mother's property in the us was confiscated from his family. Following being denied for a great appeal in the lower court docket, James become a huge hit his decision to the Supreme Judicial Courtroom. The problem at conflict in this case was whether James mom, Anna, was defined as a feme-covert or perhaps as a citizen of The United States. This court case was known as Martin v. Massachusetts.
In line with the Source, in eighteenth-century Anglo-America a married women, legally, was known as the feme-covert. Women considered a feme-covert was completely included in her hubby and had zero recognized legal identity. The lady had zero right to purchase, sell or perhaps own home independently of her partner. In the case of Martin v. Ma, the individual James Martin presented the simple fact that his late mother left the us because his father would. In other words, Anna had no second option due to the feme-covert law which states which the man speaks and works for the wife. The argument created by the ter-tenants was that Anna had the justification to stay and claim nationality due to the fact that each of the land held by her husband was indeed hers because it was passed down simply by her daddy.
In the end, the Supreme Legislativo Court of Massachusetts reigned over that Anna Martin was bound by her marital life vows together to follow her husband to England. The court corrected the confiscation and the land was returned to the Martin family. Due to the fact that the confiscation of Ould - Martin's real estate was reversed, the justices stated that women could not action independently of her partner in political or economic matters.